Skip to content
BioBlog

Tag: nature of science

a bit off-topic, maybe?

January 2, 2008 | Alison | nature of science

… but after one of last year's weekend Schol sessions, someone asked me how you get to be a uni lecturer/researcher ie what would you have to do to get there. And we talked about it a bit. And now I'm searching round for a blog topic & thought, you're all probably heading for some sort […]

Continue reading

weird & wacky… science?

December 5, 2007 | Alison | nature of science

Now that things are (sort of) winding down for the year, I thought I'd share some gems of pseudoscience with you. This is an ongoing interest of mine & I'm hoping that you'll apply your critical filters to what follows (& I'd be interested in your comments, too!)

Continue reading

evolution & the nature of science

November 14, 2007 | Alison | critical thinking, evolution, nature of science, scholarship biology

I like to teach my students here at Waikato something about how the theory of evolution was developed. OK, I'm interested in history anyway, but it's also a really good way to teach about the nature of science. You know; what is science, really? What does the word theory mean to a scientist? How's science done? Well, […]

Continue reading

Evolution – micro, macro, what’s the difference?

November 1, 2007 | Alison | evolution, nature of science, scholarship biology

You'e probably come across the terms 'microevolution' and 'macroevolution'. 'Microevolution' is generally taken to mean small-scale changes in a population's gene pool, while 'macroevolution' is evolutionary change at the level of species, or genus, or phylum. This distinction can cause problems with understanding…

Continue reading

Ants, drugs & aphid slaves

October 18, 2007 | Alison | animal behaviour, nature of science, new science stories

I was browsing SciTech Daily Review (always a good source of breaking science stories) when this headline caught my eye: Ants drug their aphid slaves. What a tantalising title! It led me to a just-published article (T.H.Oliver et al. 2007) looking at how ants control the aphids that they 'farm'.

Continue reading

Things to think about when reading a scientific paper

October 14, 2007 | Alison | critical thinking, nature of science

Sometimes I base these blogs on a scientific paper that's caught my eye. I'm hoping that sometimes you'll search out the original reference and read it for yourself. But when a paper is cited in support of an argument – how can you decide whether the contents stack up?

Continue reading

Further food for thought

October 7, 2007 | Alison | critical thinking, nature of science

After I posted Food for thought?, I got a message from a student saying that she'd seen the study reported on the Documentary Channel. She thought the results looked good, but commented … it never stated if they had a control, possibly placebos, so that it can be assesed whether some of the children merely concentrated more […]

Continue reading

Food for thought?

October 2, 2007 | Alison | critical thinking, nature of science

We hear a lot, these days, about eating healthy foods (& not too much of anything!). If you read the ads, and sometimes news items, you'll find some particular foods promoted as being particularly good for you. One of these is fish oil, rich in omega-3 oils and supposedly good for brain development, among other […]

Continue reading

The improbability of an eye… (‘intelligent design’ part 2)

September 11, 2007 | Alison | evolution, nature of science

The camera-type eye of humans (& in fact all vertebrates) is often held up as a classic example of what ‘intelligent design’ (ID) proponents call irreducible complexity. The argument goes like this: a) the camera-type eye needs all its parts to function. b) It couldn’t possibly be assembled randomly as Darwinian theory claims. c) The […]

Continue reading

“intelligent design” – science or philosophy?

September 9, 2007 | Alison | critical thinking, evolution, nature of science, scholarship biology

At my scholarship preparation day yesterday I was asked if students could expect an exam question about evolution and intelligent design. My answer? No, because "intelligent design" is not a scientific explanation for the diversity of life on earth. My reasons for saying this? Read on… 

Continue reading

  • « Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • Next »

Search Bioblog

Pages

  • About Bioblog
  • Archives
  • Checkout
  • Order Confirmation
  • Order Failed
Swan girl - portrait of the author as a young scientist This blog in response to comments from secondary school biology teachers. I hope to use it as a way of encouraging critical thinking, looking at scientific papers that are relevant to the Level 3 curriculum and to Scholarship.

Most Read

  • of cicadas & cordyceps
  • “killer neandertals” – does this one really stack up?
  • more on sodium chlorite – the ‘miracle mineral supplement’
  • sam bailey on isolating viruses, and why she is wrong
  • mms – the woo-filled gift that keeps on giving
  • what is the “magneto” protein, & why are references to a 2016 paper suddenly in my feed?
  • the costs of transpiration
  • mount st helens as a model for the grand canyon? somehow i don’t think so
  • northern rata – first it’s an epiphyte, then it’s not
  • schol bio exam – a performance standard

Recent Comments

  • Denise Duane on is it a drone? is it a giant mozzie?
  • Alison on more on sodium chlorite – the ‘miracle mineral supplement’
  • martin on more on sodium chlorite – the ‘miracle mineral supplement’
  • Alison on “killer neandertals” – does this one really stack up?
  • Mark Francis on “killer neandertals” – does this one really stack up?

Tags

1080 acupuncture animal behaviour animal diversity anti-vaxxers Biology Olympiad biotechnology blogging books chemistry communication covid-19 creationism critical thinking developmental biology ecology ed education environment and ecology evolution extinction fluoridation genetics gmo history of science human evolution humour journalism medicine miracle mineral supplement nature of science new science stories plant responses plant structure pseudoscience scholarship biology science science & society science and society secondary schools social media STEM tertiary study transition vaccination

Recent Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • November 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021

Categories

  • Add category
  • animal behaviour
  • animal diversity
  • communication
  • critical thinking
  • ecology
  • education
  • evolution
  • genetics
  • history of science
  • human evolution
  • humour
  • nature of science
  • new science stories
  • plant responses to the environment
  • plant structure
  • scholarship biology
  • science and society
  • Uncategorised

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2023 BioBlog | All views expressed on this site are the the authors on and do not represent the opinions of the University of Waikato.