I was spurred to write this by a comment Grant made on my previous post on the various NZ political parties’ stances on science education. In that post I linked to the website of a ‘special character’ school: one with a religious underpinning & which states that they replace ‘evolution’ with ‘creation’ in the school’s science curriculum:
All strands are covered as stated in the National Curriculum: The Living World, the Physical World, the Material World and Planet Earth and Beyond. As a Christian school we change the sub-strand called ‘Evolution’ to ‘Creation’. This links with our extra subject Creation Studies.
Which leads me to wonder exactly what such schools do teach in science classes…
Possibly a rather incoherent Living World curriculum, especially given that the National Curriculum document has this to say about the Living World strand (my emphasis):
The Living World strand is about living things and how they interact with each other and the environment. Students develop an understanding of the diversity of life and life processes, of where and how life has evolved, of evolution as the link between life processes and ecology, and of the impact of humans on all forms of life. As a result, they are able to make more informed decisions about significant biological issues.
Evolution• Recognise that there are lots of different living things in the world and that they can be grouped in different ways.• Explain how we know that some living things from the past are now extinct.
[l]earn about science as a knowledge system: the features of scientific knowledge and the processes by which it is developed; and learn about the ways in which the work of scientists interacts with society.
Alison says:
A point. Before you state that animals could not survive the flood, check what the Bible says. There are three chapters on it in Genisis.
PLease check facts before you make a statement.
Alison Campbell says:
Genesis =/= ‘facts’. The size & mass of animals, their daily energy & water requirements, the need for food for carnivores (they could hardly eat their fellow travellers, now could they?), the quantities of waste they produce – these are facts.
But this is by-the-by – there is no solid, factual, scientific evidence that there was a global flood in the first place.